River rights: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
[[Montreat biodiversity]] | [[Montreat biodiversity]] | ||
A vibrant group working for rights of nature in Cincinnati [https://crowohio.org/blog/] [[Crowohio] | A vibrant group working for rights of nature in Cincinnati [https://crowohio.org/blog/] [[Crowohio]] | ||
[[Asheville Riverfront Development Commission]] | [[Asheville Riverfront Development Commission]] |
Revision as of 08:55, 30 December 2023
How the rights of nature are different than the SDG framework But the Rights of Nature movement is different than the sdgs. It’s a growing movement to enshrine a legal instrument that describes the inherent rights associated with ecosystems and species. As such, the Rights of Nature concept challenges post-Enlightenment laws as grounded in a framework of nature as a “resource”, to be owned, used, and degraded. In this framework, humankind is the central or most important element of existence. If nature is given ‘personhood’, then legally, it would be equal to humankind, but this poses problems.
The Unviversal Declaration of the rights of rivers link [[1]]
The Magpie River is the first river with rights in Canada. [[2]]
A vibrant group working for rights of nature in Cincinnati [3] Crowohio