River rights: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The [[Unviversal Declaration of the rights of rivers]] link [[https://www.rightsofrivers.org/]] | The [[Unviversal Declaration of the rights of rivers]] link [[https://www.rightsofrivers.org/]] | ||
The [[Magpie River]] is the first river with rights in Canada. [[https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/these-rivers-are-now-considered-people-what-does-that-mean-for-travelers]] | |||
Revision as of 16:12, 6 August 2023
How the rights of nature are different than the SDG framework But the Rights of Nature movement is different than the sdgs. It’s a growing movement to enshrine a legal instrument that describes the inherent rights associated with ecosystems and species. As such, the Rights of Nature concept challenges post-Enlightenment laws as grounded in a framework of nature as a “resource”, to be owned, used, and degraded. In this framework, humankind is the central or most important element of existence. If nature is given ‘personhood’, then legally, it would be equal to humankind, but this poses problems.
The Unviversal Declaration of the rights of rivers link [[1]]
The Magpie River is the first river with rights in Canada. [[2]]