Rivers have rights: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Several tribes, including some large ones in the southeast are looking into being part of the movement of rivers having legal rights. | Several tribes, including some large ones in the southeast are looking into being part of the movement of rivers having legal rights. | ||
Rights of nature legal timeline pdf w links [[https://celebratewcffg.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/rights-of-nature-for-wcffg.pdf]] | |||
Rivers with rights can sue to protect themselves. Scientific American story, on | Rivers with rights can sue to protect themselves. Scientific American story, on | ||
Revision as of 10:32, 19 August 2023
Several tribes, including some large ones in the southeast are looking into being part of the movement of rivers having legal rights.
Rights of nature legal timeline pdf w links [[1]]
Rivers with rights can sue to protect themselves. Scientific American story, on NZ and Ecuador [[2]]
The Magpie River first Canadian river with legal rights.
Rivers have rights through the same legal fiction as corporations having the rights of personhood. Link [[3]]
Will river personhood save this NZ river? Guardian story [[4]]
The Hoosic River Watershed is one of the most organized efforts to win the rights for a river that a corporation already has link [[5]]
The midwest’s Ogalala Aquifer is running dry link [[6]]
Negotiated rights on the Klammath River U.S. link to case study [[7]]
The rights of rivers and beavers in the UK
The seven states and the Climate rights of the Colorado link [[8]]
Link [[9]]
The Wanganui River in New Zealand link [[10]]
Federal judge strikes down Lake Erie ‘s bill of rights. Link [[11]
The Earth Law Center had made a declaration of River rights link [[12]]