River rights: Difference between revisions
(Created page with "How the rights of nature are different than the SDG framework But the Rights of Nature movement is different than the sdgs. It’s a growing movement to enshrine a legal instrument that describes the inherent rights associated with ecosystems and species. As such, the Rights of Nature concept challenges post-Enlightenment laws as grounded in a framework of nature as a “resource”, to be owned, used, and degraded. In this framework, humankind is the central or most imp...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
How the rights of nature are different than the SDG framework But the Rights of Nature movement is different than the sdgs. It’s a growing movement to enshrine a legal instrument that describes the inherent rights associated with ecosystems and species. As such, the Rights of Nature concept challenges post-Enlightenment laws as grounded in a framework of nature as a “resource”, to be owned, used, and degraded. In this framework, humankind is the central or most important element of existence. If nature is given ‘personhood’, then legally, it would be equal to humankind, but this poses problems. | How the rights of nature are different than the SDG framework But the Rights of Nature movement is different than the sdgs. It’s a growing movement to enshrine a legal instrument that describes the inherent rights associated with ecosystems and species. As such, the Rights of Nature concept challenges post-Enlightenment laws as grounded in a framework of nature as a “resource”, to be owned, used, and degraded. In this framework, humankind is the central or most important element of existence. If nature is given ‘personhood’, then legally, it would be equal to humankind, but this poses problems. | ||
The [[Unviversal Declaration of the rights of rivers]] link [[https://www.rightsofrivers.org/]] | |||
The [[Magpie River]] is the first river with rights in Canada. [[https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/these-rivers-are-now-considered-people-what-does-that-mean-for-travelers]] | |||
[[Montreat biodiversity]] | |||
[[Local Climate Response Groups]] | |||
[[River cane and why it’s important]] | |||
[[Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature]] | |||
[[Indigenous Environmental Network]] conference in Cherokee early august 2024 | |||
[[Indigenous Rights of Nature Movement]] from [[7 Directions]] | |||
A vibrant group working for rights of nature in Cincinnati [https://crowohio.org/blog/] [[Crowohio]] | |||
[[Asheville Riverfront Development Commission]] | |||
Latest revision as of 07:56, 19 July 2024
How the rights of nature are different than the SDG framework But the Rights of Nature movement is different than the sdgs. It’s a growing movement to enshrine a legal instrument that describes the inherent rights associated with ecosystems and species. As such, the Rights of Nature concept challenges post-Enlightenment laws as grounded in a framework of nature as a “resource”, to be owned, used, and degraded. In this framework, humankind is the central or most important element of existence. If nature is given ‘personhood’, then legally, it would be equal to humankind, but this poses problems.
The Unviversal Declaration of the rights of rivers link [[1]]
The Magpie River is the first river with rights in Canada. [[2]]
River cane and why it’s important
Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature
Indigenous Environmental Network conference in Cherokee early august 2024
Indigenous Rights of Nature Movement from 7 Directions
A vibrant group working for rights of nature in Cincinnati [3] Crowohio