Rivers have rights: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Rivers have rights through the same legal fiction as corporations having the rights of personhood. Link [[https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/vanishing-midwest-ogallala-aquifer-drought]] | Rivers have rights through the same legal fiction as corporations having the rights of personhood. Link [[https://www.nationalgeographic.com/magazine/article/vanishing-midwest-ogallala-aquifer-drought]] | ||
The [[Hoosic River Watershed]] is one of the most organized efforts to win the rights for a river that a corporation already has link [[https://hoorwa.org/]] | |||
[[Corporate legal personhood]] | [[Corporate legal personhood]] | ||
Revision as of 19:58, 9 August 2023
Several tribes, including some large ones in the southeast are looking into being part of the movement of rivers having legal rights.
The Magpie River first Canadian river with legal rights.
Rivers have rights through the same legal fiction as corporations having the rights of personhood. Link [[1]]
The Hoosic River Watershed is one of the most organized efforts to win the rights for a river that a corporation already has link [[2]]
The midwest’s Ogalala Aquifer is running dry link [[3]]
Negotiated rights on the Klammath River U.S. link to case study [[4]]
The rights of rivers and beavers in the UK
The seven states and the Climate rights of the Colorado link [[5]]
Link [[6]]
The Wanganui River in New Zealand link [[7]]
Federal judge strikes down Lake Erie ‘s bill of rights. Link [[8]
The Earth Law Center had made a declaration of River rights link [[9]]